Arcp 2000 Cracker

2021年11月20日
Download here: http://gg.gg/wymvu
Remotely control DU1AZ station using ARCP2000, Teamviewer and Skype.
*Arcp-2000
*Arcp 2000
*Arcp 2000 Cracker Barrel
*Kenwood ARCP-2000 Radio Control Program is IBM-compatible PC software for the Kenwood TS-2000 series transceivers. This program allows programming, advance radio control and Internet remote control.
*EPA 340/1-77-011 MAY 1977 Stationary Source Enforcement Series COMPLIANCE STATUS OF MAJOR AIR POLLUTION FACILITIES U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Enforcement Office of General Enforcement Washington, D.C.
*Dehydrators, NESCO LSS-2-6, Fruit Roll Sheets for Dehydrators FD-28JX, FD-37, FD-60, FD-61, FD-61WHC, FD75A and FD-75PR, Set of 2.,White 4.6 out of 5 stars 2,081.
*Preparatory actions, elaboration of management plans and/or of action plans A1 Kick-off steering group meeting. This preliminary action was completed on 20 June 2014.

A. Preparatory actions, elaboration of management plans and/or of action plans
A1 Kick-off steering group meeting
This preliminary action was completed on 20 June 2014. Two kick-off meetings were finally held: (a) the first kick-off meeting was held on 31st January 2014, in the Town Hall of Grevena. During the meeting some methodological details of implementing certain actions and administrative issues were discussed
and (b) the second was held on 18 June 2014. During this second meeting details on implementation of the project and on the elaboration of the Inception Report were discussed and agreed.
The Action Plan which was the result of both meetings agreement was approved by the Steering Group.

A2 Identification - delineation of sectors with high risk of human-bear conflicts (*pdf)

 In July 2014 the GIS expert was hired by ANGRE project partner, and has started the elaboration of the GIS data base structure in cooperation with the head bear expert from CALLISTO project partner.
 In September-October 2014 the first elaboration of the surveying tool (semi-structured questionnaire) was completed by CALLISTO partner.
 In November 2014 the new expert who conducted the questionnaire survey throughout the project area, through interviews, was hired by CALLISTO project partner. The reason why he did not started the questionnaire survey at this period is because the majority if not all of the livestock raisers leave the area by the end of October each year. Therefore it would have been useless to disseminate the questionnaire in late fall 2014 as we would had missed the core part of information needed for the analyses.
 In January, February, March 2015, and in order to gain as much precious time as possible, partner “CALLISTO” has officially addressed several public authorities and bodies in order to collect all the necessary background data as follows:
 Contacts with ELGA for the provision of 2013, 2014 database on bear damage on livestock and agricultural production. Necessary data were provided in digital format.
 Contacts with Regional Services (Veterinary Services, Forestry Services, DOAK, OPEKEPE etc.) for the provision of data on livestock capital and agricultural production. Necessary data were provided in hard copy format.
 Contacts with MAVAPNP project partner for the provision of data and the necessary GIS layers. Necessary data were provided in digital format.
During the same period the final elaboration and setting of the questionnaire final structure was completed. The questionnaire (in Greek) contains: seven (7) sections and nineteen (19) questions and it is structured in such a way so as to collect information on bear occurrence and bear-human conflict inferring factors related to bear damage on agricultural production.
 In spring 2015 (mainly in May) a pilot dissemination of the questionnaire was performed among several livestock raisers present in the project area, in order to overcome a certain scepticism on behalf of them, but also to evaluate the feedback and the quality of information collected as well as to make the final adjustments in order to make it more operational.
 From mid-summer to early fall 2015 (July- September) took place the systematic dissemination of the questionnaire through personal interviews with farmers. The reason of choosing this period is again because it covers the optimum period of livestock raisers presence in the project area giving the opportunity, especially at the end of the season, to have the most representative cumulated vision on damage problems having occurred throughout the season.
 In total seventy eight (78) questionnaires have been filled in through an equal number of interviews covering the whole project area. All the information has been entered in the relevant data base which has been elaborated in xlsx format. This data base will be annexed to the technical report as stated here below,
A technical report on the identification - delineation of sectors with high risk of human-bear conflicts with relevant thematic maps and accompanying GIS data base was the deliverable of this action A2. The report has been delivered timely on 31/10/2015 according to the reviewed actions time schedule.


A3 Stakeholder analysis (*.pdf)

Action A3 started in May 2015 and was concluded in September 2015. Data were collected by means of 25 semi-structured interviews and 4 focus groups. Participants included members of stakeholder groups in bear conservation and management all over the National Park of Northern Pindos. Narratives were concentrated on two crucial issues concerning bear conservation and management in the study area. Namely, the fact that bears come quite close, sometimes even within, rural villages. Additionally, a focus was the use of poisoned baits, which might have a serious adverse effect on the local bear population. For both topics, strengths and weaknesses in the heterogeneous local context have been outlined. Interview and focus group extracts were used to conduct two SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analyses, one for each topic, where Action A3 has been focusing (e.g., bears approximating rural villages; use of poisoned baits). SWOT analyses revealed points of convergence among stakeholders and in dicate potential areas of consensus and agreement. The results of Action A3, and especially, SWOT analyses prepared in the frame of this Action, will further inform Action C1.


A4 Delineation and mapping of a thematic ’bear trail’
The action was a prerequisite for starting implementation of Action E9, in which the study was utilized properly (see Action E9, below).
The study was assigned to the Consultants Company SYSTADA S.A. in July 2014 and was completed on time.
Τwo separate reports have been produced, one for each path. Despite that the two reports have a significant degree of overlap, mainly on the general information of the area, this presentation structure was chosen as the most convenient for the continuity of the overall project.
In the first chapter of each report the description of the proposed path and the surrounding area are presented. Also some basic social and historical data presented for the surrounding communities. In the second chapter there is a description of the natural and human environment of the area and information given on geology, climate, habitat types, flora, fauna and land use. In the third chapter information concerning the biology and ecology of the brown bear and the coexistence with human are presented, in order to contribute as possible to the creation of the content of the Environmental Education program. In fourth chapter it is examined whether the proposed paths meet the criteria for an environmental education trail. Finally, the fifth chapter present the proposals for the use of the paths.
The report is also accompanied by printed and electronic maps of both paths on a suitable underlay (resolution 1: 10,000 and 1: 50,000) and photos.


A5 Assessment of the distribution and numbers of bears in the project area
In July and August 2014, a first general prospection of the area was performed by the two member field team in charge of action A5 field part implementation. The purpose of this first survey was to examine the status of previous hair-trap sampling stations and to select new locations. In September, October, November and December 2014 took place the installation of the complete hair-traps sampling network over the entire project area covering a surface of circa 3,400km2. In total 476 sampling stations have been installed (which is 4 times up the initially scheduled number).
The spatial distribution of the 476 sampling stations (hair-traps) over the total project area was also listed with their coordinates in the accompanying xlsx files respectively (see annex in progress report). The altitudinal distribution of the total hair-trap stations is illustrated on graph (1).The altitudinal distribution of the positive sampling stations (with bear hairs) is located between 400m and 1000 m (a.s.l)
In mid May 2015 took place a technical meeting between members of the field team and the wardening personnel from MAVAPNP project partner. The purpose of this meeting was one hand the transfer of know-how on techniques for bear hair samples collection from the hair-traps sampling stations and on the other hand the transfer of all the necessary spatial and geographical information in order for the wardens to work independently.
In late May and June 2015 combined surveys involving CALLISTO project partner field team (in which enrolled an internship student from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (School of Biology) and the wardening personnel from MAVAPNP were conducted for bear hair samples collection.
In September 2015 took place a short complementary survey conducted by CALLISTO field team. It was preceded by a second technical meeting with MAVAPNP wardening personnel for data update. This action did not progress any further due to project financial constraints and premature termination.
In total 261 bear hair samples have been collected and stored according to the given working protocol (paper envelope, in zip-lock bags with silica gel. The sampling stations (hair-traps) with positive findings are shown on map and are listed in the accompanying xlsx file (annexed to the progress report).
The results from the two sampling surveys as well as the total outcome are illustrated on the maps included in the Activity Report for this action, included in the Technical Annexes accompanying the Final Report. These maps show the spatial concentration of positive hair-trap sampling stations (1st, 2nd surveys and total) using Kernel density estimators method.
Conclusions:
The sampling protocol has been designed in order to make the collected sample as representative as possible.
The timing of the hair-traps network installation allowed two well targeted sampling surveys the following years (in two periods).
The number of sampling stations and the collected sample size exceeded deliberately the initially scheduled quantitative figures in order to palliate the non implementation of the other two survey protocols foreseen in this action (IR camera traps and bio-signs).
The necessary know-how from the NGS (Non-invasive Genetic Sampling) protocol was transferred to the MAVAPNP project partner personnel through two technical meetings.
The installed hair-traps network is the most appropriate tool in the hands of the MAVAPNP wardening personnel for a long term monitoring of the bear population in the project area.
The preservation status of the hairs sample protects them from alteration thus allowing a laboratory analysis in later times.


A6 Study for valorisation, certification & promotion of bear friendly products and services
C. Concrete conservation actions
C1 Stakeholder consultation and involvement

C2 Training for staff of the National Park and other conservation actors in the project area

C3 Operation of two Anti-Poison Dog Units
The Action has proceeded up to the point of the signing the contract with the Jesus Lopez Valladolid (http://www.perroscontraelveneno.es), the supplier of the detection dogs. The contract was signed on 25/05/2015, but it did not proceed any further due to the general problems and constraints of the project.
Regarding the recruitment of the two handlers from MAVAPNP, with the Decision No 795/7-8-2015 (ΑΔΑ: ΩΝ4Σ46Ψ8ΒΩ-ΘΧΟ) the Management Board has authorized a Committee in order to carry out the specific tender. The tender issue was prepared by the Action coordinator but was pending for the purchase of the dogs from ANFRE.
Being in close contact with the anti-poison units of the Egyptian vulture LIFE (LIFE10 NAT/BG/000152), the co-ordinator of the Action spotted some issues concerning the number of the dogs that each handler will have.
It would be more difficult for each handler to successfully take care of 2 dogs, for the reasons provided below:
The handler can only work with one dog at a time. Therefore the other dog will have to be left at (the handler’s) home thus making difficult to look after it.
The case that the handler can travel with the 2 dogs cannot take place, because each dog is kept in a certain crate in the back seat of the car. Since he/she can work with one dog it is dangerous to leave the other in the car.
The daily routine of the handler will take up a lot more time in taking care of two dogs instead of one. Since they are ’working dogs’ they need special routine and ’re-training’ in order to keep up with their duties. It appeared a lot more convenient to have one dog and focus on its development through training, than having two and struggle to keep up with their basic needs.
For the above reasons, project team decided to purchase 2 dogs and not 4 as it was foreseen. That decision would also resulted in a significant reduction on the Action’s budget.
Since ANGRE did not implement the purchase of the dogs mainly because of the Coordinating Beneficiary’s decision after the Steering Group of 3/09/2015 to suspend the project, MAVAPNP did not published the tender for the recruitment of the two handlers.
Worth noting that there were instances within the project’s period, mostly working in co-operation with the anti-poison units of LIFE10 NAT/BG/000152, that valuable experience was gained.
This experience will be used in future related activities by MAVAPNP.

C4 Operation of a Karelian Dog Unit
Due to project’s financial and administrative constraints the plain implementation of the action in the project area, involving purchase and transportation of the KBDs from the US to Greece, as well as the entire training phase that had been arranged and scheduled to take place in fall 2014 in the project area, and of course the operation of the KBD’s in the field, did not finally take place. Since this period the action has remained stagnant. The action could be reignited rather easily given the fact that all the preparatory phase with the selected KBD providers and trainers has already been completed. The main issue is to secure the funds in order to cover the fixed budget of this part of the action and thus regain confidence towards the KBD providers/trainers. The relevant Milestones “Acquisition of two (2) KBD by the project, “Training of KBD achieved” and “Training of two (2) staff members from the Northern Pindos National Park personnel on KBD handling and operation achieved”, had to be moved in time and precisely by mid spring 2016. The same goes for the deliverable “technical guide on training KBD’s trainers” which will be delivered after completion of KBD’s and future handlers training.
However during the period between July 2014 and January 2015 further steps achieved in the preparatory phase of action C4 implementation as follows:
Achievements/results:
July 2014: On behalf of beneficiary partner CALLISTO and in concentration with the beneficiary responsible MAVAPNP, further and more specific contacts with KBD’s speciliazed Association “Jackknife mountain” Karelians (Mrs Charisse Hablenton) http://www.jackknifemountainkarelians.com (based in California, US) were made for further budgeting reconsiderations and revisions.
Further queries on KBD’s specialized institutions based in Europe were made to the following addresses:
http://www.bearbusters.pl/
http://www.thorvalta.pl/index.php
http://karelczykizjury.pl/kontakt_en.html
http://www.lafortea.com/
http://www.pikimusta.cz/kontakt/?lang=en
http://www.bjoernehund.dk
http://www.gautegiz.com/
http://www.karhuniemen.dk/English/About_us.asp
There has been only one reply from Martyna Binek – Kasperkowiak, BearBusters FCI, The Karelian Bear Dog Kennel, http://www.bearbusters.pl
Apart from this feedback from the Polish Association (http://www.bearbusters.pl/) no other responses had been received. Therefore and judging upon the quality of offer and services proposed, readiness, expertise and compliance to time schedules and budgets the project partners have decided to proceed with “Jackknife Association” and have entered the finalization phase of the next steps such as: puppies purchase, calendar of puppies education, training and transportation to Greece, in situ complementary training etc.).
August 2014: On behalf of CALLISTO and in cooperation with the beneficiary responsible for the Action (MAVAPNP), further and more specific contacts with KBD’s speciliazed Association “Jackknife mountain” Karelians (Mrs Charisse Hablenton) http://www.jackknifemountainkarelians.com (based in California, US) of providers and trainers, were made for budget finalization in compliance with the budget line of the project.The first rough schedule of the whole procedure had been discussed. The two puppies had already been selected: one male (named Loki) and one female (named Gyda) (see photos 1 & 2) and they had already been initiated in their pre-training phase. The dates of their purchase and their transportation from the US to Greece accompanied by the two providers/trainers had been also finalized for October 2014.
September 2014: During the Management Board Meeting of MAVAPNP on 15th of September, the second handler of the Karelian Dog Team (on behalf of the MAVAPNP personnel) was selected. He was scheduled to enrol the action at the arrival of the trainers and the KBD puppies.
October 2014: All arrangements had been made regarding the arrival of the KBD providers/trainers from “Jackknife Association” with the KBD puppies which was scheduled for October 18th, 2014.Unfortunately this did not happen due to the fact that the financial part of the action was aborted at the last moment by the project.
January 2015: Despite the negative developments regarding this action, project partner CALLISTO pursued efforts in seeking a cheaper formula for the project (given the budget limitations) in order to acquire KBD’s from Bear Emergency Teams in Europe. To this purpose contacts with DIREN (France) and Adamello-Brenta National Park in Trentino (I

https://diarynote-jp.indered.space

コメント

最新の日記 一覧

<<  2025年7月  >>
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112

お気に入り日記の更新

テーマ別日記一覧

まだテーマがありません

この日記について

日記内を検索